Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MA\-55\s+Tower\s+and\s+Foundation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MA\-55\s+Tower\s+and\s+Foundation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] MA-55 Tower and Foundation (score: 1): Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:28:21 -0500; I am thinking about getting a MA-55 tower. My soil conditions are rock with just a 3" covering of soil. Digging a 3' x 3' x 5' hole is exceedingly expensive. Since the idea of the deep hole filled wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00570.html (7,916 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] MA-55 Tower and Foundation (score: 1): Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:50:47 -0500; Thank you Pete. I thought of that, unfortunately the rock is brittle shale, and will break very readily. What I was looking at doing, was using large anchor bolts in the existing slab (at least 19 cu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00571.html (8,694 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] MA-55 Tower and Foundation (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:43:55 EST; with just a 3" covering of soil. Digging a 3' x 3' x 5' hole is exceedingly expensive. Since the idea of the deep hole filled with concrete is to prevent overturning, I was thinking of alternative. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00597.html (8,413 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]