Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lossy\s+Traps\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lossy\s+Traps\s+$long$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (long) (score: 1): Author: barockteer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:19:43 -0400; I submitted this last night but it didn't post, so I have attempted to shorten it some more. My apologies if it is a double post. The issue of lossy traps is only one of a number of factors that ente; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00638.html (14,978 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (long) (score: 1): Author: Tom-W3FRG <w3frg1@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:22:37 -0400; I used a Fluke 80T-150U temperature probe, connected to a Fluke handheld DVM to measure temperature. All measurements are in degrees Fahrenheit. During the experiments, I measured temperature at thre; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00647.html (7,970 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (long) (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:35:58 -0700; There's a whole lot that *could* be done, but I think the real question is whether Tony's data can provide a "bound" for the losses, and I think that his measurement technique probably does that adeq; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00650.html (8,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]