Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Looking\s+for\s+recommendations\s+for\s+an\s+80\s+M\s+DX\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Looking\s+for\s+recommendations\s+for\s+an\s+80\s+M\s+DX\s+antenna\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Looking for recommendations for an 80 M DX antenna (score: 1): Author: Don Solberg <dsolberg8132@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 11:43:29 -0600; My QTH is in northern Wisconsin, in the middle of a pine forest, with all sand soil. My current 80M antenna is an inverted V up about 50 ft in a pine tree. This works very well for local nets but obv; /archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00002.html (7,578 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for recommendations for an 80 M DX antenna (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 12:55:04 -0800; I have a similar situation, in a redwood forest. Dense forests like ours soak up vertically polarized RF, so verticals are a bad idea for us. My only verticals are for 160M, where any horizontal ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00003.html (9,354 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]