Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+attraction\s+to\s+\"attic\s+dipoles\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+attraction\s+to\s+\"attic\s+dipoles\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Lightning attraction to "attic dipoles" (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-Online.Net>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:59:24 -0600; Has anyone seen or heard of anything that would make you suspect that dipoles in the attic would increase the likelihood of a strike to the house? Is there any reason to disconnect them from my equip; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00000.html (7,019 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning attraction to "attic dipoles" (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera); Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 15:20:43 +0000; I wouldn't be worried that the dipole will "attract" lightning but the fact will remain that any nearby strike (maybe within a mile or so) will definitely induce a current in the dipole. If it's atta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00012.html (9,564 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Lightning attraction to "attic dipoles" (score: 1): Author: "Dudley Chapman" <chief@thechief.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:51:54 -0500; Jim, It seems that both everyone and noone is an expert on lightning. So there is no reason to think that I have any more insight into your question than you would have. However, there is something I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00015.html (9,846 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Lightning attraction to "attic dipoles" (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-Online.Net>; Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:53:04 -0600; I want to thank everyone who responded to my questions about 1) increased risk of a strike because of the antennas in the attic(many other wires already in the attic anyway) and 2) danger in not disc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00042.html (8,027 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]