Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-400\s+vs\.\s+CommScope\s+vs\.\s+Belden\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-400\s+vs\.\s+CommScope\s+vs\.\s+Belden\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: "Allen R. Brier" <britech@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:17:42 -0800; Can someone provide a comparison between LMR-400 and the equivalent cables from CommScope and Belden? Thanks and 73, Allen Ross Brier, N5XZ SET BriTech Systems Incorporated NICET Fire Alarm Level IV; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00036.html (7,413 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:56:16 -0700; Study their data sheets. They re all on the internet! Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contest; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00052.html (7,101 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:12:07 -0400; Commscope is a bit less expensive, at least via The RF Connection. I'm very happy with the CommScope LMR 400 equivalent performance. I have not researched nor tried the Belden LMR400 equivalent. 73 b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00053.html (7,204 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:29:13 -0400; I looked for an LMR-600 equivalent and didn't find one. Is there such an animal? Fortunately a kind soul gave me 200 feet of 5/8" Heliax which will work just fine for either 6 or 2-meters. Now I need; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00054.html (8,754 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:27:25 -0400; Check out CommScope WBC 600 and Andrew CNT-600. The Andrew is a direct substitute, the CommScope is a bit different. Watch the power rating--CommScope is only 10.4 kW while the others are 40 kW!--Mik; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00056.html (7,839 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - KØRC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:39:14 -0500; What??? Only 10.4 kW??? Dang! That rules out the CommScope cable for me, except for my mobile installation I guess... 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 3; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00065.html (8,845 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:49:30 -0700; Yeah, I'd have to go out in the garage and turn the secondary amp down a bit. Tom W7WHY What??? Only 10.4 kW??? Dang! That rules out the CommScope cable for me, except for my mobile installation I gu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00066.html (7,974 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: "Allen R. Brier" <britech@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:59:14 -0800; What I'm really looking for are y'all's experience with these cables, with respect to ease of use, bending radius, connectors, water ingress, etc. I have an offer to get 800 ft of LMR-400 equiv. Comm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00067.html (9,517 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 00:05:02 -0400; Compromises, compromises...Go with cheap coax and you save money but have to reduce the power. Well, maybe you could use it in the UHF driver circuits. I haven't spent a lot of time on the sites, but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00068.html (9,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]