- 1. [TowerTalk] KT34XA or KT36XA WITH LADDER LINE ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Fabio Grisafi - IT9GSF" <fabio.grisafi@libero.it>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:49:55 +0100
- Hello Guys ! I have to refurbish my KT34XA antenna with the M2 kit to have a KT36XA antenna but I have an idea ! What about using a ladder line (300 Ohm or 400 Ohm) and use a tuner at the station lev
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00290.html (7,172 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] KT34XA or KT36XA WITH LADDER LINE ? (score: 1)
- Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:56:35 -0000
- Don't worry about high swr causing line loss at the band edges with a KT-34XA. Don't worry about burning up the balun. I run 1500W RTTY all the time. Coax cost is minimal, compared to the cost of tha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00292.html (8,359 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] KT34XA or KT36XA WITH LADDER LINE ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@adelphia.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:15:33 -0500
- In addition to the comments already made by Dave K6LL, I have several comments. First, if your experience withte the KT34XA to KT36XA upgrade goes anything like mine did, you're not going to see high
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00328.html (7,386 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] KT34XA or KT36XA WITH LADDER LINE ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry G" <larry@k7mi.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:26:40 -0800
- I agree with adding the drain holes. I use a triple stack of KT36XAs here and although the end caps fit tightly I still had problems with water getting into the tubes. I suggested this to M2 but the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00330.html (9,209 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu