Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+KLM\s+40M\-2B\s+Opinions\s+Please\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: KA9S 3 <ka9s3@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:27:05 -0500
I have a chance to buy a used two element linearly loaded shortie-fourty beam at a low price. It is a KLM 40M-2B. I am a CW only operator, so bandwidth isnt of much concern to me. I would be putting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00374.html (7,212 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: <donhall161@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:26:33 -0500
Jeff, I lost three of these insulators on two of the single element version. They cracked and dropped an element half each time(Not good). On the advice of my good friend N5AR, replaced mine with a 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00377.html (7,070 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:07:35 -0400
Did you reuse the black insert from the old insulators? They are designed to elevate the elements slightly in a gull wing in order to minimize element droop. When I had a 4/4 of 4el KLM's I lost some
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00384.html (8,748 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:19:47 -0400
Jeff, I bought a used one 12 years ago and had it up at the home qth here for 11 years, then moved it out to the NR4M contesting qth. Never had a problem with it. While it was set for cw, running low
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00387.html (7,055 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:02:58
Jeff, I had a KLM 4el "Big Sticker" 40 meter and was plagued with insulators deteriorating in the heat and ultra violet of the Arizona sun. I made some Lexan insulators that worked ok. I finally gave
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00391.html (8,499 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:25:58 -0500
I believe there are "early" ones and "later" ones. The early ones broke a lot and the later ones don't break as much. I have quite a number of the late ones in a box from a couple KLMs I scrapped if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00407.html (7,598 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: KA9S - Jeff <ka9s@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:56:10 -0500
Thanks for all the replies. It seems that the consensus is the 40M-2B has maintenance issues, especially with the Lexan element to boom mount cracking (which M2 has abandoned and redesigned - expensi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00416.html (7,937 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:13:55 -0400
I've been contemplating supporting the elements also but not with Phillystran. Instead I would use some #14 hardrawn copper and wind up with a 2 el on 30M. I havent modeled it yet to see what spacing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00422.html (9,284 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:19:48 -0500
I got quite a number of inquiries about these KLM boom-to-element insulators. I'll take $20 each + shipping. Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00425.html (7,759 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:49:07
Jeff, When I converted my Big Sticker over to a 3 el 30 meter beam the old boom to element clamps lasted about a year. I got the new boom to element clamps from DX Engineering. I am happy with them s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00427.html (9,470 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] KLM 40M-2B Opinions Please (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:10:24 -0400
Add another $13 for the new clamps and 1/4" hardware. After awhile it starts to add up but if the MTBF increases from 1-2 years to 8-10 years its a bargain. Carl KM1H ________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00434.html (10,786 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu