Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+JK301\s+30M\s+Dipole\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] JK301 30M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: Elliott Lawrence via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:50:54 -0800
I have a12 year old Force12 30M linearly loaded dipole. It works fine when the local sea air doesnt cause the loading wire connections to corrode making the antenna unusable. Im tried of needing to r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00046.html (8,749 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] JK301 30M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: Richard Thorne <rthorne@rthorne.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:14:30 -0600
Elliot, I have several JK Antennas including a 3040SR which has 4 elements on 40m and 3 elements on 30m.  All 7 elements are coil loaded. These are robust antennas and the hardware is excellent.  We
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00047.html (9,629 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] JK301 30M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 06:05:42 -0600
In my opinion, high q loading coils are a much better loading method than linear wires. FWIW, full sized 30m elements are pretty manageable and it's quite easy to homebrew a rotating dipole. The issu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00050.html (7,782 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] JK301 30M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: Jon Zaimes via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:21:36 -0500
I've built and installed numerous JK models, including the 3040SR, and found them all to be of sturdy construction and the manuals easy to follow. Support from Ken was tremendous. 73/Jon Jon P. Zaime
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00052.html (11,038 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] JK301 30M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: Mpridesti via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:58:07 -0500
As a tower and antenna installer, I agree with Jon. Assembly is straight forward, manual although generally good, a few typos are scattered around, but everything is fine. Very rugged construction an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00053.html (12,734 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] JK301 30M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 08:47:10 -0800
<I have a12 year old Force12 30M linearly loaded dipole. It works fine when the local sea air doesn?t cause the loading wire connections to corrode making the antenna unusable. I?m tried of needing t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00070.html (8,439 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] JK301 30M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: Dave Sublette <k4to.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 12:07:29 -0500
I designed a full length 40 M dipole using old Telrex elements and some added tubing. I did the stress analysis, etc. I had to double and triple wall several places. It is broadbanded over the entire
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00071.html (11,134 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu