Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Its\s+summer\s+and\s+antennas\s+are\s+on\s+my\s+mind\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Its\s+summer\s+and\s+antennas\s+are\s+on\s+my\s+mind\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Its summer and antennas are on my mind (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>; Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:28:11 -0500; I have been thinking for a while about a second tower. I currently have 120 foot tower with a C3E and XM240 stacked on top. For 80 I have a full sized sloper and for 160 I have an inverted vee with t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00960.html (7,704 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Its summer and antennas are on my mind (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:27:00 -0500 (CDT); Bill: <snip> I was wondering if maybe gamma matching the tower with multiple radials would provide a significant improvement on 160M? <snip> The saying is very true on Topband: You can never have eno; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00961.html (8,108 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Its summer and antennas are on my mind (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>; Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:55:43 -0500; I had also thought about an inverted L. It would be fairly easy to do, if I had two towers. I hadn't done it prior to this because there is no way to put radials anywhere near the base of my current; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00962.html (9,443 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Its summer and antennas are on my mind (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:17:54 -0400; I had no problems working WAZ and over 200 countries on the 3 WARC bands during the mostly slow parts of the last cycle with a 160M inverted V with 80/75M inv Vees hung from the same feed which was a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00968.html (10,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]