Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Inverted\s+v\s+or\s+flattop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Inverted\s+v\s+or\s+flattop\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Inverted v or flattop (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 22:07:04 -0500; I have 3 towers, a 53' 25g, a 52' crankup and a 30' 25G I can support a 40meter dipole from the 30' to 30' up the 53' tower as a flat top or pull the center support up to 50' on the crankup. So which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00046.html (7,247 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted v or flattop (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 05:43:10 +0000; <Dear son, ............. I would have enclosed five dollars for your college books but I had already sealed the envelope. Love, Mom> (I couldn't resist) 73 de Gene Smar AD3F ________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00050.html (8,635 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted v or flattop (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 05:56:54 -0400; 53' tower as a flat top or pull the center support up to 50' on the crankup. So which would be better for overall use on 40? Inverted v with ends at 30 AND CENTER AT 50 OR A FLATTOP AT 30? The prima; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00053.html (8,056 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted v or flattop (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:46:42 -0400; A 40m dipole at 30 feet is not quite 1/4 wavelength off the ground. At that height, there's not going to be much of a pattern with most of the energy going straight up. 50 is a better height. Even wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00334.html (8,119 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]