- 1. [TowerTalk] Info on Andrew FHJ4-50? (score: 1)
- Author: K4VV@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:49:30 EDT
- I have about 200' of this very stiff 1/2" Heliax in new condition. Would be useful in my current antenna project. Can't find info on this Heliax on the Andrew website, or by Internet search. Would ap
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00164.html (6,672 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Info on Andrew FHJ4-50? (score: 1)
- Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:22:45 -0400 (EDT)
- Jack, FHJ4-50 is an old version of Heliax, when Heliax was actually helical. Your cable is probably 30-40 years old. Connectors are often available at hamfests, with part numbers that begin with 44,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00166.html (8,219 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Info on Andrew FHJ4-50? (score: 1)
- Author: Gerald Boutin <towertalk@infinichron.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:14:17 -0600
- "The FHJ cable was discontinued over 20 years ago. It is said to have been replaced due to its poor long-term attenuation stability. The attenuation per foot increases over time." http://lists.conte
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00169.html (8,112 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Info on Andrew FHJ4-50? (score: 1)
- Author: ersmar@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:47:55 +0000
- Jack: I have four type 44AU connectors that I bought over five years ago when I was accumulating parts for my tower and antennas. I never did get to buy and install the half-inch hardline run, so the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00170.html (8,469 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Info on Andrew FHJ4-50? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 07:18:57 -0500
- If the value becomes close to zero, don't pitch it, use it for radials. 73, Jim be the connectors _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tower
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00172.html (8,144 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu