Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Hardwired\s+coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Hardwired\s+coax\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:49:28 EDT; Howdy -- I'd like an estimate of the implication to SWR of hardwiring some RG-213. By that I mean using crimp butt connectors to couple the inner conductor and the shield instead of your normal conne; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00607.html (6,984 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:19:11 EDT; several different types of parallel line at 14MHz. With "Open Air Dielectric 19/1.30" I get 50+j6 ohms at the far end when the line is looking into a 50+j0 load. That was my feeling but the antenna -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00609.html (7,898 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:26:33 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I would do the test using an SWR analyzer and a non-inductive 50 ohm resistor. I doubt if you would see any significant difference at 14 MHz. Bill W6WRT ________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00610.html (6,976 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:32:45 -0400; Could be something incidental to the repair, like a shield strand across the coax or water ingress? Was the feedline mechanically damaged? I wonder if a connector got pulled hard somewhere? I can sa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00612.html (7,761 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:19:26 EDT; across the coax or water ingress? Gerald, K5GW, mentioned the water ingress and I'm becoming more convinced that that's the problem. The bottom part of the feedline did spend several months luxuriati; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00620.html (7,951 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:34:12 -0400; Are you sure that the stepper motors are functioning? The only time that I've seen high SWR and yet the antenna still functioned properly is when I had a hairpin match break. I don't believe the Mons; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00623.html (8,267 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:50:45 EDT; Yep. The antenna acts like an antenna and functions normally. I've seen high SWR and yet the antenna still functioned properly is when I had a hairpin match break. What hairpin match? SteppIRs have a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00006.html (7,089 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:58:38 -0400; Wouldn't wouldn't water in the coax cause fluctuating SWR and poor antenna performance? Have you tried QRO? GL John Yep. The antenna acts like an antenna and functions normally. I've seen high SWR an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00018.html (8,111 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardwired coax (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 21:43:33 EDT; antenna performance? Have you tried QRO? Yeah, we're gonna BURN out the bad stuff! Hey - it might work - hi. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. _________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00019.html (7,231 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]