Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Hardline\s+from\s+obsolete\s+analog\s+cellular\s+sites\s+\(\?\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:53:06 -0400
Do I understand correctly that analog cellular service will be history in the next year or so? At that point, won't there be a sudden surge of surplus 50-ohm hardline available? I'm wondering if some
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00735.html (7,426 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: "Cameron Crum" <ccrum@dot11net.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:35:51 -0500
No reason they would be ripping this stuff out. Just because the RTT changes doesn't mean they are using different frequencies that would require a change of coax. In fact, I can tell you from spec-i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00737.html (9,756 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: "Kyle Chavis" <wa4pgm@kinex.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:58:47 -0400
I have several cell sites that I manage and can tell you that Analog will not be leaving my employer for a least another 5 years. Not saying some providers will decide sooner or not. All current new
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00748.html (9,701 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:21:04 -0500
How will your employer handle FCC mandates? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00752.html (8,109 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: "Kyle Chavis" <wa4pgm@kinex.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:47:19 -0400
They'll have to handle it just like any other provider would and make the change. It still won't happen overnight, there are many areas with Analog only cells. Perhaps 5 years is a stretch but its go
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00754.html (8,828 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: Gary <mcduffie@actcom.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:12:40 -0600
What are the mandates? I haven't heard what is going on in that industry. I can tell you that if analog goes away around my area, there won't be any cell phone coverage to speak of. The way it is now
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00756.html (8,747 bytes)

7. RE: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: "Kyle Chavis" <wa4pgm@kinex.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:00:22 -0400
What little bit of 1 5/8 Heliax I had is now gone. I have 10 new Andrew L7PNF 2 piece Female connectors and 5 or 6 used one piece connectors left. If interested please make a offer, currently I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00777.html (8,613 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Townley <nx7u@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:59:41 -0700
What are the mandates? I haven't heard what is going on in that industry. I can tell you that if analog goes away around my area, there won't be any cell phone coverage to speak of. The way it is no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00780.html (10,141 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu