Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ham\s+IV\s+vs\s+Yaesu\s+G\-1000DXA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ham\s+IV\s+vs\s+Yaesu\s+G\-1000DXA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Ham IV vs Yaesu G-1000DXA (score: 1): Author: Dale Agler <mechcom2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:38:37 -0700 (PDT); Hello al TowerTalk Folks, Been looking at this forum for a long time but never got on it until now.I`m finnaly able to put up the tower I`ve always been wanting with the antennas TOO!!! Tower is a US; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00066.html (7,080 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham IV vs Yaesu G-1000DXA (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:25:34 -0500; Congratulations on the new tower! First of all, I would put the 240 on top, for less TO angle on 40 meters (better DX performance). Assuming you are using a long mast for the upper antenna. I would g; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00068.html (9,075 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham IV vs Yaesu G-1000DXA (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:20:08 -0400; I have been using a G-1000SDX to turn the C-3E/EF-240S combo for about 7 years, and the C-3 alone for 3 years before that. No problem. The EF-240X is a bigger antenna (longer elements) but I think ba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00076.html (11,066 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]