Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HY\-GAIN\s+18HT\s+HIGH\s+TOWER\s+\&\s+CTSVR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HY\-GAIN\s+18HT\s+HIGH\s+TOWER\s+\&\s+CTSVR\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] HY-GAIN 18HT HIGH TOWER & CTSVR (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 07:45:45 -1000; Also, does anyone have comparison with the Uni-Hat CTSVR antenna, built by N5NUG? It is 31 feet tall, has a 15 foot diameter top hat--eight Alum. "spokes" with a wire circumference run around the spo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00158.html (8,995 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] HY-GAIN 18HT HIGH TOWER & CTSVR (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 10:00:30 -1000; now. performed Aloha Bill, Thank you so much for your comments. Yes, the CTSVR appears to be a disaster waiting to occur in our heavy trade winds out here. I have been leaning toward the Hy-tower for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00159.html (8,907 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] HY-GAIN 18HT HIGH TOWER & CTSVR (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 20:19:44 +0800; Hi Jim. First a little about the antennas here. On 80 I have a dipole up about 80 feet in a tree, On 40, phased verticals and on 160 an inverted L in a tree about 70 feet vertical and rest horizontal; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00160.html (8,127 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] HY-GAIN 18HT HIGH TOWER & CTSVR (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 18:20:03 +0000; Jim Reid wrote, about the CTSVR: (well, a "folded monopole"...) That's right, it is only the feedpoint resistance that is raised. The radiation resistance stays exactly the same as a non-folded monop; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00163.html (12,824 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] HY-GAIN 18HT HIGH TOWER & CTSVR (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 06:20:05 +0800; Yeah, but that 2.2 db worse that a dipole is at about 15 degrees, where your lobe at 50 feet on 80 meters is 2.2 db better straight up. Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00169.html (7,332 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]