Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+The\s+Need\s+for\s+Grounding\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:22:10 -0500
It's simply Ohm's law that still is valid. Yes, voltage across all the inductance adds in too. In my case, my tower is grounded with a resistance to ground of about 3 ohms (when it was tested some ti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00293.html (13,124 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: Edward McCann via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:35:00 -0800
On point. It is unlikely Ohm's Law will ever be repealed, by the current crew in the beltway or that if the pretenders to the throne. AG6CX Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00294.html (15,400 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:49:14 -0600
The important thing to remember is electricity doesnt follow the shortest path somewhere, it follows the path of least resistance. And its important to point out that during a lightning event, that p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00296.html (17,574 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:55:16 -0600 (CST)
The Ohm's Law that we can all quote E=IR is an extremely simplified version that is only valid for "lumped models". and of course only for resistance. it must be expanded to include lumped capacitors
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00299.html (15,281 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:02:09 -0600 (CST)
lightning may not even follow the path of 'least resistance', at least as you conceive it. connecting a low resistance wire to a ground rod does not mean that the lightning current will follow that w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00301.html (18,012 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:23:36 -0800
NO -- it follows the path of least IMPEDANCE, which is the path of least INDUCTANCE, which is the SHORTEST path. Resistance matters ONLY to the extent that a low resistance takes longer to vaporize,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00303.html (9,794 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:42:46 -0600 (CST)
YOU MUST REMEMBER, lightning is not RF, its not DC, its not even AC... it is a fast rise time pulse, those can not be handled with normal impedance equations and lumped models... for instance a big f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00306.html (10,513 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:02:10 -0800
On 1/14/16 8:49 AM, Kelly Taylor wrote: The important thing to remember is electricity doesnt follow the shortest path somewhere, it follows the path of least resistance. And its important to point o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00308.html (10,534 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:24:42 -0500
As I see it: First semester circuits. The first book I opened looked simple until I saw the way they solved the problems Instead of the way I had always solved those circuits with Ohms Law. They were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00311.html (17,246 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: The Need for Grounding (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:14:54 -0500
NO! It can follow many paths. The current dividing according to the impedance of each path. 73, Roger NO -- it follows the path of least IMPEDANCE, which is the path of least INDUCTANCE, which is the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00315.html (10,653 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu