Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+RG\-149\:\s+50\s+ohm\/70\s+ohm\s+\-\s+does\s+it\s+matter\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+RG\-149\:\s+50\s+ohm\/70\s+ohm\s+\-\s+does\s+it\s+matter\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter? (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:41:48 -0500 (EST); Correct Don, That's what I will try to do with my next 2-meter antenna. As I have a bundle of 72 Ohms feed lines why not utilize it all the way. Hans - N2JFS I wonder why no one has mentioned the fac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00330.html (10,839 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter? (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:47:30 -0500 (EST); Jim, If I recall my radio teacher, 50 ohms were decided sometimes during WW2 or even earlier. There were some switch from (I may be wrong here) from 50 to 52 ohms at one point. As a result the "obsol; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00331.html (11,711 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:27:34 -0500; " If I recall my radio teacher, 50 ohms were decided sometimes during WW2 or even earlier. There were some switch from (I may be wrong here) from 50 to 52 ohms at one point. Lots of folklore ranging; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00333.html (11,192 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]