- 1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: CC&R's (score: 1)
- Author: hanslg@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:33:00 -0400
- The problem you will have is not necessary the writing but the CC&R board. They may simple come and tell you to take the tower down for whatever reason. I would, myself stay away from anything that e
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00404.html (9,288 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: CC&R's (score: 1)
- Author: Joseph or Ruth Patrick <hdmc38@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
- I would say if your a ham looking to purchase property and thinking of putting up some kind of size able antenna then stay away from HOA'S,CC&RS,DEED RESTRICTIONS,P&Z CODES and anything else that eve
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00411.html (10,950 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: CC&R's (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:53:01 -0400
- In our Township, (Midland Country, Home Township, Michigan) Ham radio towers are written into the zoning. We could go to 80' although I think I heard it's been raised to 100' without a zoning permit
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00420.html (14,235 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: CC&R's (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:02:15 -0400
- <sheesh!> Midland County, Homer Township. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00421.html (16,010 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu