- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: [SteppIR] 3El height (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:32:41 -0700
- I agree. That height parameter so dominates all the others, I think that all you can really do with trying to do beam steering (in the vertical plane) is possibly suppress something that is coming fr
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00870.html (11,584 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: [SteppIR] 3El height (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:35:52 -0700
- I think that in the long run, just as with Yagi design, a few hams will do lots and lots of experiments and try lots of things, and those will filter out to the ham community at large. The most chall
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00871.html (12,477 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: [SteppIR] 3El height (score: 1)
- Author: <john@kk9a.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:55:04 -0400
- I'm not sure why my message posted three times when I only sent it once. Yes, I meant using an elevation or azimuth rotator won't change the angle of radiation. This is assuming level ground, if your
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00872.html (10,424 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: [SteppIR] 3El height (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:59:10 -0700
- Sure, changing the pointing direction *will* will change the elevation angle for peak of the pattern. However, the ground reflection effects will mean that you don't get a "degree for degree" change.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00875.html (12,273 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu