Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fulton\s+K2550\s+on\s+a\s+UST\s+TX\-455\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fulton\s+K2550\s+on\s+a\s+UST\s+TX\-455\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fulton K2550 on a UST TX-455 (score: 1): Author: WD0M <WD0M@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:56:49 -0700; Hi Guys and Gals, After owning a US Towers TX-455 crank-up/tilt-over tower for a few years, I got tired of all the effort it took to cranking the Fulton K1550 winch to raise and lower the beast. I re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00371.html (7,607 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Fulton K2550 on a UST TX-455 (score: 1): Author: "res1q6fs" <roger.white@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:58:20 -0600; Joe, where did you order your Fulton K2550 from and is it a K2550 0101 or K2550 0301 model? I have a K1051/KX1051 on my HCX555 and am considering a different winch for raising to make it easier. The; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00375.html (8,366 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fulton K2550 on a UST TX-455 (score: 1): Author: WD0M <WD0M@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:16:32 -0700; Hi Roger, The model (per the box) is K2550 1142. Works very well. The effort is dramatically reduced. My wife thinks I replaced it so I can have HER crank it up and down - not a bad idea.... I haven'; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00377.html (9,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]