Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Front\s+to\s+Back\s+Measurements\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: kbottles@rafn.com (Kim Bottles)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:05:22 -0800
Greetings Ladies & Gentlemen, I claim to know very little about antenna theory. However I have noticed something on a practical level with a new antenna and wonder if any of you might be willing to c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00291.html (10,043 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:38:18 -0500
Kim, Your anecdotal report is something that all of us have experienced at one time or another. It's possible that it was a 50 dB F/B. It's also possible that your S-Meter is not calibrated accuratel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00295.html (12,224 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 12 Dec 2001 19:54:08 -0800
When results are unbelievable, the experiment is likely bad. Most assuredly your s-meter is NOT 6dB per S-unit. More likely around 3dB. And not "linear" (oxymoron) either, being probably less than 3d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00297.html (9,509 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:11:13 -0500
Kim Bottles recently reported on his SteppIR beam. Actually you have the option of getting 1, 2 or 3 elements with a separate 6 meter parasitic element option. The antenna is pricey but an innovative
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00299.html (9,005 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:34:11 -0500
Stan, W7NI was first with the correct answer in a private reply to me, though Jim Rhodes was JUST 3 minutes behind him. Congratulations, Stan!! Bill, N3RR A "Scotch" S Meter is a stingy one that does
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00302.html (9,791 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:51:31 -0500
However... back in the 50s when I learned it, the original usage was Scotch meaning "stingy" ("mean" for our British friends). "Bourbon" S-meters must have been invented later by someone who chose to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00304.html (9,039 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:09:46 -0800
In this area we tend to use the term "tight" or "tight was" meaning that the purse strings, or purse snaps were so tight that no money would come out. Chris opr VE7HCB List Sponsored by AN Wireless:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00306.html (10,082 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:55:29 -0800
Hi Kim, While 50 dB F/B is certainly possible with a 3 element yagi, it would generally only hold up over a very narrow frequency range and a very narrow range of elevation angles (imagine a deep, bu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00309.html (14,265 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: realex@flash.net (Bob Alexander)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 06:00:46 -0600
Hi Kim, It is not possible to get an accurate F/B measurement (or any kind of pattern measurement)from any rig that has the AGC turned on. Also, the signal must be a constant carrier, not SSB. I am n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00310.html (9,017 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:45:18 -0600
HUH? IF the S-meter is used as a fixed level indicator in conjunction with a calibrated external step attenuator there is no problem. N4KG (Receiver Design Engineer) If you want to *hear* small diffe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00312.html (9,994 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: k6xx@juno.com (Bob Wolbert)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:53:29 -0800
Your rig's internal attenuator is generally quite accurate. Even using 5% resistors, the maximum error is about a dB, and is typically much less. This gives you accurate reference points with step si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00321.html (16,367 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:06:05 -0500
The step attenuator on my MP is 6db. Nice if you think of S units in 6 db steps. It's also rather accurate (checked it). It also shows rather quickly that the steps below "S9" are non linear, and "wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00323.html (18,905 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:14:53 -1000
The resistors "die" when the rig transmits with the attenuator still in the antenna lead!! Be careful with that attenuator, whether you build it up from a kit, or buy one: they are for receive use o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00328.html (9,151 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:57:28 -0500
MFJ sells a push-button step-attenuator (I designed it) that has 1 dB steps up to 81 dB. It uses surface mount components and 0.5% chip resistors on a groundplane double sided board with BNC connecto
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00330.html (9,335 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:09:31 -0800
Yes, I should have mentioned that I can place my RF attenuator in an external RX antenna loop through that is on the RX side of my rigs T/R relay. I wouldn't dare trust my ability to to keep the rig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00334.html (10,619 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Front to Back Measurements (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 23:48:46 -0600
Same here. Hmmm....interesting connection. You may have identified a contributing factor to some of the popular antenna myths. Tom N4KG _______________________________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00350.html (9,025 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu