- 1. [TowerTalk] Forked Radial System (score: 1)
- Author: n1lo@hotmail.com (Mark .)
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:13:40 -0500
- Greetings Gang; I have been following the discussion of counterpoise systems for 0.25 vertical radiators with great interest. I especially liked the suggestion to use forked radials. It occurred to m
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00304.html (10,571 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Forked Radial System (score: 1)
- Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn)
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:32:13 -0800
- Good Idea Mark: You save wire plus ditching or burial effort which is equally important (maybe more so). 73, Dan, N5AR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00305.html (12,083 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Forked Radial System (score: 1)
- Author: eric@k3na.org (Eric Scace)
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:15:55 +0300
- I was actually wondering about this arrangement the other night. Has anyone tried it in the field or with NEC4? -- Eric R3/K3NA Greetings Gang; I have been following the discussion of counterpoise sy
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00357.html (11,346 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Forked Radial System (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 07:07:09 -0600
- One MAJOR difference between a full radial system, or a system with a perimeter wire with .05 (or 025) WL separation, is that the additional wires are equally spaced. With a FORKED system, the simple
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00360.html (7,558 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Forked Radial System (score: 1)
- Author: jskatz@sk.sympatico.ca (Sylvan Katz)
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:20:39 -0600
- Has the forked radial system been modeled or tested? It sounds very interesting I have to install a radial system in the backyard and the forked system sounds like it would be ideal for me if it wor
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00362.html (7,411 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu