Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Vertical\s+comparison\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Vertical\s+comparison\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: Vertical comparison question (score: 1): Author: "KM5VI" <km5vi@flukey.cc>; Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 01:09:03 -0500; My experience with Gap is that they generally offer the potential for the lower wave angle of a vertical design but really have no gain unless you are over very conductive ground (like saltwater cond; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00046.html (8,209 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Vertical comparison question (score: 1): Author: "David C. Cole" <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 08:33:40 -0700; Hi, I have a Gap Challenger, and the report on the antenna below would apply with the exception of the frequencies mentioned... The Challenger does best on 40 and 20 in my case. I have a more in dept; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00052.html (9,779 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Vertical comparison question (score: 1): Author: "Dan Schaaf" <dan-schaaf@att.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 20:21:44 -0400; I posted earlier on this subject that I have a HyGain AV-640 which I really love. I just saw in the new HyGain/MFJ catalog today and they now have a HyGain AV-680 which covers all bands from 6 throug; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00089.html (11,713 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]