Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Custom\s+antenna\s+design\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Custom\s+antenna\s+design\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: Custom antenna design (score: 1): Author: "KM5VI" <km5vi@flukey.cc>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:38:45 -0500; Three thoughts: For a horizontal beam it is theoretically possible, but in the practical world, difficult at best (not really viable) because of the compromises in efficiency and useable bandwidth. F; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00209.html (7,867 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Custom antenna design (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:12:53 -0700; Just guessing here, but a coil loaded Moxon might work. It probably wouldn't provide a lot more gain, but if it worked it would have a much improved pattern. Moxons rely on coupling between the folde; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00210.html (8,348 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Custom antenna design (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:43:57 -0700; Just guessing here, but a coil loaded Moxon might work. It probably wouldn't provide a lot more gain, but if it worked it would have a much improved pattern. Moxons rely on coupling between the folde; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00216.html (8,581 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] FW: Custom antenna design (score: 1): Author: "Matt" <km5vi@flukey.cc>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:15:53 -0500; Have you considered taking the alligator approach with improved ears? Stay with your dipole and QRO if you can't be heard. Invest in the best, small, directional receive only antenna that your budget; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00222.html (9,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]