FYI Broadcaster in CT has a 200' AM tower for anyone who will pay for it to be taken down and removed. Doesn't want it taken down by anyone except a professional crew. rob/k5uj From: "WSHU Engineerin
$3500 for an almost 50 year old tower seems a bit expensive to me. That would be the equivalent of $175 for a 10' section. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net
One other note to add... I think this tower was not designed to handle a large rotating antenna. The bracing is flat, which is great for climbing, but not good for twisting. 73, Keith NM5G $3500 for
HOWEVER - it would be absolutely dynamite on 160M and 80M.....with a professional radial system to boot.. now with a couple of beverages...... Since they are moving... I wonder if they would be willi
And with the exception of HAM use, it is pretty much useless. No carrier would go onto it as a rental tower. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self S
There's assets, and there's liabilities. de Paul, W8AEF _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and l
A heads up to any ham interested in this AM tower... Although the website says "similar to Rohn 55," this tower is dissimilar in at least one very important aspect: it does not have diagonal bracing.