Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FCC\s+and\s+Tower\s+Lighting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FCC\s+and\s+Tower\s+Lighting\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FCC and Tower Lighting (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene); Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:07:24 -0700; From ARRL Hudson Division's Loop FCC ISSUES SECOND TOWER WARNING The FCC has issued a second warning to owners of radio antenna structures after an ambulance helicopter nearly hit an unlit radio towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00204.html (8,573 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] FCC and Tower Lighting (score: 1): Author: pizzabob@TWLakes.Net (Bob Lovell); Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:23:47 -0600; On 1/12/99 Stu Greene wrote, in part: One of my amateur friends informed me that some new ruling somewhere makes tenants on radio towers equally liable with the owner for lighting/painting infraction; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00275.html (7,876 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] FCC and Tower Lighting (score: 1): Author: GRITelecom@aol.com (GRITelecom@aol.com); Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 12:05:10 EST; << One of my amateur friends informed me that some new ruling somewhere makes tenants on radio towers equally liable with the owner for lighting/painting infractions. This seems unreasonable, as, for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00276.html (8,200 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] FCC and Tower Lighting (score: 1): Author: ka4inm@gate.net (Ron Youvan); Date: Sat, 16 Jan 99 01:59:05 PST; Hi: Bob KK4TD said: snip This seems unreasonable, as, for instance, a paging company with dozens of sites could hardly be expected to check every tower each night for burned out beacons! (I am requir; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00280.html (8,106 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]