Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FAA\s+stuff\s+$and\s+FCC\s+registration\s+too$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FAA\s+stuff\s+$and\s+FCC\s+registration\s+too$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FAA stuff (and FCC registration too) (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:56:48; While we're on the subject, I was surprised to discover a (relatively) new requirement for FCC registration of any towers that require FAA approval. I didn't see any exception for amateurs, so this m; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00503.html (7,886 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] FAA stuff (and FCC registration too) (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:56:00 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Pete, You are correct. It definitely is a paper issue for the guys with really tall towers. The FAA requirements are not waived for amateur towers. Anything over 200 fe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00507.html (9,880 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] FAA stuff (and FCC registration too) (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 17:56:50 EDT; There are no exceptions for ham towers. We follow the exact same regs as everyone else. Redundancy in the type-approved lighting fixtures usually keeps you out of trouble from having a "blackout". Wh; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00508.html (7,652 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] FAA stuff (and FCC registration too) (score: 1): Author: jphillip@primenet.com (John Phillipp); Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 15:57:05 -0700; Hi Pete... This re-registration requirement is from last year, and it's not just for the guys with tall towers. I put up my 55 foot crankup in 1993. I needed FAA approval because I am less than 1/2 m; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00511.html (9,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]