Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Elevated\s+Radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Elevated\s+Radials\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:06:42 -0500; Hi Guys, The 1/4 radials that I was asking about are ELEVATED radials for an Inverted L, not radials lain on the ground. I didn't explain this. 73 Bob KQ2M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FA; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00337.html (6,696 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:40:58 +0100; If radials are far enough from ground to really approximate an electrical counterpoise, then it's better if the counterpoise itself is symmetrical in order to decouple the antenna from the transmissi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00340.html (7,651 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: carsten.esch@olympus-software.com (Carsten Esch); Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 09:11:31 +0100; Hi, I know there was a lot of discussion about this matter in the past... I have one lambda/4 vertical with burried radials in the moment and want to put up a second with elevated radials for compari; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00012.html (7,635 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: W8JI@aol.com (W8JI@aol.com); Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 11:43:38 EDT; I used six feet on 80 meters. << 2. Should the radials resonant for the desired frequency or is that not necessary?<< The radials should be resonant. I resonated my radials by tuning them as a dipole; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00026.html (12,354 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: ditzian@greenepa.net (Jan L. Ditzian); Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 13:54:53 -0400; Carsten, I cannot make a recommendation for the best vertical, but I have found that an 80-meter lambda/4 vertical with the base about 2 meters high and eight lambda/4 radials works better than a gro; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00057.html (8,256 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 02:38:22 -0700; The above is absolute nonsense. Reference "Reflections", Chapter 4, page 4-10 Use the same reference. A tuner maintains a constant Zo ONLY between the signal generater and the tuner. It has absolutel; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00066.html (8,253 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: W8JI@aol.com (W8JI@aol.com); Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 12:47:21 EDT; Hi Ed, Strong words! measure reflected power, keeping the meter near full scale for both page 4-10<< My statement is absolutely correct. The Bird meter, as do ALL directional coupler meters, reads co; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00092.html (9,298 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:39:03 -0400; Does anyone on this reflector have a source of information regarding using elevated radials with a ground mounted 1/4 wave vertical? My Hygain Hytower is at ground level but I would like to put 4-5 e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00051.html (6,715 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:02:38 -0400; A couple of items concerning elevated radials = http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=15573 http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=18618 http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00052.html (7,111 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:50:41 -0400; Here is some info: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA193283 I attach an article by some Dx-pedition that used verticals and elevated verticals. http://pages; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00055.html (8,816 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: Tom McDermott <tom.mcdermott4@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:54:04 -0700 (PDT); Hi Bob: In general, elevated radials are strongly resonant, and need to be treated like a radiating part of the antenna (because they are). This means making sure that current is shared equally bet; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00056.html (7,623 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: Wilson Lamb via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 21:14:54 -0500 (EST); My friend Steve, W3AHL is a good modeler. He took my basic wish for a good 160m vertical and designed elevated radials to fit. Much as described in one of the recent postings, Steve recommended four; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00090.html (7,705 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]