Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Disclaimer\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s+why\s+art\s+thou\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Disclaimer\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s+why\s+art\s+thou\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Disclaimer........ why art thou? (score: 1): Author: Ed Goodman" <n5nug@ix.netcom.com (Ed Goodman); Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 23:15:39 -0500; I have always been curious as to why this statement is presented in email messages on the web. Especially on this reflector. 73, Ed - N5NUG "Disclaimer: I don't know these folks, I've no financial or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00404.html (8,121 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Disclaimer........ why art thou? (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 04:25:56 +0100; It's intended to show others (those on the list to which the posting is made) that what is being said is "unbiased" and is not intended that the person making the posting is, or will be, receiving an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00405.html (10,037 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Disclaimer........ why art thou? (score: 1): Author: realex@flash.net (Bob Alexander); Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 19:43:25 -0500; Perhaps I've missed something, but these disclaimers seem totally absurd Bob, W5AH --Original Message-- It's intended to show others (those on the list to which the posting is made) that what is bein; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00408.html (10,681 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Disclaimer........ why art thou? (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 02:01:04 -0400; Perhaps you've never received a nasty email accusing you of getting paid by a manufacturer for your recommendations. Disclaimers don't bother me. Disclaim away. Everyone has a delete key, and they ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00410.html (12,801 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]