- 1. [TowerTalk] Direct-burial coax choice? (score: 1)
- Author: jmaass@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Jeffrey Maass)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 08:20:20 -0400 (EDT)
- I have a 250-foot run to my 160M inverted-L. I am currently using RG-213 laying on top of the ground, but I'd like to make the installation more permanent by burying the feedline. What is my best cho
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00277.html (7,407 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Direct-burial coax choice? (score: 1)
- Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
- << What is my best choice for direct-burial 50-ohm coaxial feedlines? What about half-inch jacketed hardlines? X-Perts that they label "UV-Resistand/Direct Burial." Since the MIL standard for coax ca
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00280.html (7,587 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Direct-burial coax choice? (score: 1)
- Author: hires@rust.net (Floyd Soo, W8RO)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:34:55 -0700
- Jeff, I too have runs of 200-300 feet for my feedlines. Your best choices are indeed hardlines. Many of them are designed for direct burial. 50 ohm stuff like Andrews Heliax and Cablewave line are pe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00281.html (9,081 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu