Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Different\s+lightning\s+ground\s+question\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Different lightning ground question. (score: 1)
Author: "Dudley Chapman" <chief@thechief.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:17:32 -0500
Keith's comment below reminded me of a question I had about horizontal ground rods on lightning protection systems. Current wisdom seems to suggest that if it is impossible to drive ground rods verti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00701.html (9,885 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Different lightning ground question. (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:50:34 -0800
Absolutely no difference...well... you'd need a bit more length of wire to equal the surface area of a 5/8" rod. Say 20 ft of bare AWG8. You can also bury a metal plate. All covered in the various co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00705.html (9,525 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] Different lightning ground question. (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:15:08 -0600
I think the key to vertical installation is the local water table. If I dig down 8 feet I always hit water. In rainy months the water is found a foot down while in a dry period it is about 6 feet. In
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00710.html (11,324 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Different lightning ground question. (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:02:21 -0500
Jim Lux wrote: -- Original Message -- From: "Dudley Chapman" <chief@thechief.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:17 AM Subject: [TowerTalk] Different lightning groun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00735.html (11,329 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Different lightning ground question. (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:09:55 -0500
Forgot one other advantage of a driven ground rod verses a buried wire. The sphere of influence is greater with a driven rod. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http:/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00736.html (8,517 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] Different lightning ground question. (score: 1)
Author: "Dudley Chapman" <chief@thechief.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:26:28 -0500
Gary, Thanks for those comments. Yes, driving rods down into the soil is the best thing, of course. But say you had to lay a perimeter ground in sandy soil that was on top of bedrock only a few feet
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00740.html (9,081 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Different lightning ground question. (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:45:01 -0500
When I said that the "sphere of influence is greater with a driven rod" I was thinking more of a rod driven in vertical as one side is not close to the surface as it would be if it were horizontal. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00742.html (9,707 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu