Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+DX\s+Engineering\s+Negative\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+DX\s+Engineering\s+Negative\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] DX Engineering Negative (score: 1): Author: "Wilson" <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 16:42:45 -0400; Ive experienced the schematic problem. Its a real problem, not in the ham spirit. WL _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-09/msg00056.html (7,321 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering Negative (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 16:50:18 -0400; On the other hand, stealing another manufacturer's designs by copying his schematic and making minor changes is not in the ham spirit either. Sometimes the only way to protect one's intellectual prop; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-09/msg00057.html (7,083 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering Negative (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 10:06:37 -0400; Aww, c'monJoe - the way you make things difficult is by suing the other guy - ask Hi-Z about DXE. Anyone bent on copying something, particularly something simple like a Beverage switcher, won't be de; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-09/msg00076.html (8,887 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]