- 1. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X7 / X9 Hint (score: 1)
- Author: john@gm4nhi.demon.co.uk (John Cramond)
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 16:43:56 +0100
- If you own the X7 and possibly the X9, you will find that the antenna matches nicely on 40m without the 40m add on option. On the basic X7 without a tuner I have an SWR of 1.7/1 at the low end of 40m
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00237.html (7,657 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X7 / X9 Hint (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:32:14 EDT
- Interesting note, John. I guess this begs the question "does this mean that they have a high potential for interaction with nearby 40M antennas?". Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00238.html (7,951 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X7 / X9 Hint (score: 1)
- Author: w2vjn@rosenet.net (George Cutsogeorge)
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 10:19:48 -0700
- My X9 is 14 feet under a 40-2CD and I can offer some observations as well. The vswr at 7.0 is 3:1. It nulls to 1:1 at 7.8 MHz. It has many nulls between 7 and 14 MHz that go down to 1.2 or so. As a r
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00239.html (7,766 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X7 / X9 Hint (score: 1)
- Author: D. Rodman, MD" <rodman@acsu.buffalo.edu (D. Rodman, MD)
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 07:51:35 -0400 (EDT)
- I have also noted that the X9 is louder on 40 m than any other tribander or yagi on receive that I have owned. I would suspect this is related to it's log cell. I do not remember trying to listen on
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00252.html (7,529 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu