Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+X\-9\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+X\-9\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X-9 (score: 1): Author: k7ox@pipeline.com (Gary D Elliott); Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:22:34 -0700; Hello TT I would like to talk to someone who has the X-9 or X-7 up and pro/cons of this antenna. What did it replace and are you satisfied with the performance. Thanks in advance. Gary k7ox@pipeline.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00345.html (7,182 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X-9 (score: 1): Author: john@gm4nhi.demon.co.uk (John Cramond); Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:25:48 +0100; Gary, I understand from a reliable source that the X9 is going out of production, although Cushcraft are to continue to produce the X7. As there is only one dB difference in gain between the X7 and t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00352.html (8,263 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X-9 (score: 1): Author: howk2@hotmail.com (Howard Klein); Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 11:58:26; Gary, I have used the X-9 for almost 3 years. It was an original installation at this QTH. I have used several tribanders, quads and a 5 element monobander on a 26 foot boom previously. Since they we; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00355.html (8,407 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft X-9 (score: 1): Author: n6ws@msn.com (Bill & Chris Shell); Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:06:05 -0700; Gary, I've had an X-9 with the X-940 40m add-on loaded dipole since it first went into production. It replaced my KT-34XA, which I had for 15 years, and my 2 element full-sized 40m Yagi. Overall, I f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00359.html (9,540 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]