Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Copper\s+Vs\s+AL\s+Was\s+UV\s+and\s+WX\s+deterioration\s+of\s+THHN\s+insulation\,\s+and\s+effects\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 01:22:39 -0500
How does the resistivity of the Copper Chloride (What you get with Chlorine and moisture on the surface of the Copper wire) on the surface of the Copper wire compare to the resistivity of Aluminum wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00361.html (9,008 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:58:25 -0600
I tried aluminum radials once, at my folk's house (my dad was a ham). He had an 18AVQ trapped vertical and I decided it would do better work radials. This was maybe 40 y ago. Somewhere, I'd come acro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00362.html (10,920 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:24:32 -0800
I looked up conductivity of various copper compounds - copper oxides, copper chloride, etc. They're all really high resistivity (not as high as Alumina), but more importantly, some of them do dissolv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00363.html (11,929 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:27:53 -0800
On 12/30/16 6:58 AM, Kim Elmore wrote: I tried aluminum radials once, at my folk's house (my dad was a ham). He had an 18AVQ trapped vertical and I decided it would do better work radials. This was m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00364.html (10,073 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:50:55 -0600
Has a familiar ring to it somehow. Come on fellas, the laws of physics aren't up for negotiation, a vote, or papal fiat, they is what they is. Patrick NJ5G ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00369.html (10,074 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger <k2av@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:38:55 -0500
The question is not whether the laws of physics change, they don't. Always the question is whether or not WE understand what the laws of physics ACTUALLY are. Once upon a time you could get yourself
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00373.html (10,587 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:32:07 -0800
Always the question is whether or not WE understand what the laws of physics ACTUALLY are. Well said, Guy. A great way to end the year! 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00374.html (10,297 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu