Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Complex\s+Guying\s+Question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:50:40 -0400
I have a 97' Rohn 25 tower mounted on a pier pin. The guys are at 92, 61, and 31 feet above ground. The tower has 2 C-3E tribanders at 69 and 98 feet, and an EF-240 on a 10-foot mast above the top ya
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00108.html (7,978 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 15:38:22 EDT
61, and 31 feet above ground. The tower has 2 C-3E tribanders at 69 and 98 feet, and an EF-240 on a 10-foot mast above the top yagi. We're in a pretty benign wind environment. originally set a number
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00110.html (8,786 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 14:45:05 -0500 (CDT)
His question is how do you determine the tension requirement for mixed guy materials. I would recommend using the lowest tension that you would get if each material were used for the whole guy... tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00112.html (9,692 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 14:06:45 -0700
Your "problem" (not sure you have one) is the difference in stretch of the Phillystran vs EHS. Adding more tension to the Philly helps that a bit, but at the cost of a lot more column load on the tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00115.html (9,252 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:01:46 -0400
Other than optimization, is there any reason to change the tension from 400 lbs? Does the tower sway? Do any of the guys sag too much? If not, I would leave the tension at 400 lbs. Why? Tensioning gu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00116.html (10,047 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:00:38 -0400
I think I would modify that sentence slightly to say, "...as long as the horizontal component of the tension on all three guys at a given level is the same." If the guys come off the tower at differe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00117.html (8,988 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:51:52 EDT
mixed guy materials. Okay. I don't know what the UBS (ultimate breaking strength) of the rods is but I'd go with the steel guys as the ones of interest. The other stuff is just ancillary. 400# for th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00118.html (7,856 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 22:32:27 -0400
Phillystran is ...well a bit flexible (no pun intended) and it's light weight. But that would be like using oversize EHS on the tower. At least you are not adding the extra weight of 1/4" EHS. You mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00119.html (11,578 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:58:29 EDT
Howdy, TowerTalkians -- The tower under discussion is Rohn 25G so my answer to tension the top set of HPTG6700 to 670 pounds might be a little aggressive. It might be a good idea to tension it like t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00132.html (8,001 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:51:06 -0400
Hi Steve, I read that if your guy anchors are out more than the prescribed min of 70% of the height then you can drop the 10% guy loading figure to around 8%, Would you care to comment on that? cheer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00133.html (9,305 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 06:57:29 EDT
70% of the height then you can drop the 10% guy loading figure to around 8%, Would you care to comment on that? I haven't heard that before but I'm not an engineer so I don't know if that's true or n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00134.html (8,674 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Complex Guying Question (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:34:09 -0400
There used to be a good paper on K1TTT's web site that provided some of the engineering basis for answering this question. I can't find it at the moment but perhaps it is temporarily off as Dave reco
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00135.html (10,560 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu