Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Comments\s+on\s+Array\s+Solutions\s+\"dissimilar\s+antennas\"phasingapplication\s+note\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Comments\s+on\s+Array\s+Solutions\s+\"dissimilar\s+antennas\"phasingapplication\s+note\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Comments on Array Solutions "dissimilar antennas"phasingapplication note. (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:04:47 -0400; antennas in a stack, using an oscilloscope antennas is something albeit at 7 GHz, a few comments: The scope isn't even necessary, but more interesting why would I want the source at a mile or more d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00254.html (9,169 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Comments on Array Solutions "dissimilar antennas"phasingapplication note. (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:42:43 -0700; I agree... the mile away thing makes it tough. I did the calculation as I did because the original applications note referred to a "another ham's QTH in town". The distance has to be far enough away; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00261.html (12,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]