- 1. [TowerTalk] Coaxial nverted L - 160m (score: 1)
- Author: Chuck N7BV <ck2jones@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
- GD, For quite a few years I have been using a 160m coaxial inverted L antenna. CQ Magazine Aug 84. Have the vertical section about 60' up and the rest on the horizonal. There are 14 full size radials
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00085.html (7,028 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Coaxial nverted L - 160m (score: 1)
- Author: "Gregg W6IZT" <gregg.w6izt1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:59:53 -0400
- I think the answer lies in another question. How well are you getting out compared to other stations in your immediate vicinity? 73 Gregg W6IZT GD, For quite a few years I have been using a 160m coax
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00095.html (8,335 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Coaxial nverted L - 160m (score: 1)
- Author: <john@kk9a.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:12:55 -0500
- A 60' inverted L works OK but certainly the more vertical element you have the better. In either case you need a good ground system. I am curious what the efficiency is of a coaxial inverted L? I bel
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00096.html (8,041 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu