Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+type\s+selection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s+type\s+selection\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:32:37 -0500; Could someone please explain to me why LMR-400 seems to be preferred over Belden 9913 for coax feed line? They have about the same attenuation/100' at 28 MHz, 9913 has a non-contaminating jacket and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00473.html (7,275 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: Joe - WDØM <wd0m@wd0m.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:42:41 -0700; Belden 9913 has had a history of water leaking into the interior through improperly installed connectors. I've never experienced that, even when I lived in Alaska and used 9913 for all my gear with t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00474.html (7,500 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:36:36 -0500; I used to say that, but then a lightning strike took off all the tape and coax seal at the top of the tower. 15 minuets later I water running out of the one rig and onto the desk top. Ruined the desk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00477.html (10,064 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: Joe - WDØM <wd0m@wd0m.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:57:56 -0700; Not much in the way of of lightning where I lived on the coast of Alaska. However, here in southwest Colorado, we are among the highest strike areas in the state. I just lost an HDTV, Bose stereo, co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00479.html (12,553 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:39:35 -0500; Very Impressive!! I received close to 10 replies to my question concerning LMR-400 and 9913 coax. The consensus was water ingress problems with 9913 that are not encountered with LMR-400. These respo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00483.html (8,703 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:47:33 -0500; Thanks Tom, I'd like to add that although they are much less prone to water ingress, none of the regular cables are immune to moisture and damage with the exception of direct burial cable which has a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00484.html (8,941 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:36:17 -0500; Take a look also at BuryFlex (9914F )by Davis RF. I'm putting a run of it up based on the claims about the jacket. http://www.davisrf.com/coax.php 73. Mike NF4L ______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00488.html (8,858 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1): Author: "Wes Attaway $N5WA$" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:20:11 -0600; I have had BuryFlex in use for 5-yrs and it works great. It is real tough cable, but very flexible. Quite a bit of mine is direct buried. I dug some up not long ago just to take a look and once I rub; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00489.html (10,571 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]