Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Clarifying\s+on\s+Mosley\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Clarifying\s+on\s+Mosley\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Clarifying on Mosley (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:11:30 -0600; As one of the report authors, I thought I should jump in here. The antennas were working models, borrowed from their owners for the tests, and assembled following the manufacturer directions to the l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00071.html (9,756 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Clarifying on Mosley (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 05:27:09 +0100; Thank you for the clarification. That doesn´t sound at all as "less gain than a dipole at the same location and height, and over the same path" as somebody insisted. 73 Peter As one of the report aut; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00073.html (9,654 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Clarifying on Mosley (score: 1): Author: Bryan Swadener <bswadener@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 23:59:14 -0800 (PST); Thanks, Ward. I selected a Force12 C-4XL (similar to the C31XR but, with 40m added) based on your reporting (I bought the book) and because it came available when I was seeking a good antenna. As evi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00075.html (9,724 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Clarifying on Mosley (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:10:07 -0600; That is what we observed on 10 meters, Peter. On 20 and 15 meters the antenna seemed more or less OK, if unspectacular. The reference antenna was a full-size dipole on each band mounted at the same h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00080.html (7,736 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]