Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Change\s+in\s+plans\.\s+More\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Change\s+in\s+plans\.\s+More\s+questions\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Change in plans. More questions (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 04:31:39 GMT; First I would like to again thank all who helped me on my trig question post. After I took the info and plotted out my proposed 70ft Rohn 25 tower, it took up less area than I thought so now I'm goin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00058.html (9,373 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Change in plans. More questions (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com); Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 16:34:25 +0100; On Sun, 04 Oct 1998 04:31:39 GMT "Rick Bullon" <kc5ajx@hotmail.com> writes: The distance from the property line is 1/2 of the guying baseline, or 40 feet in this case. For every foot of guy elevation; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00066.html (11,983 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Change in plans. More questions (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 12:33:34 EDT; Read "General Note #4" for the 45G. You'll see that they have taken 8 sq.ft. away from the tower loading spec to allow for a commercial symmetrical antenna mount. Add the 8 sq.ft. back into the figur; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00068.html (8,604 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Change in plans. More questions (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 19:23:16 EDT; On Sun, 04 Oct 1998 04:31:39 GMT "Rick Bullon" <kc5ajx@hotmail.com> writes: K1VR: If using all new materials, yes. Especially if you value your time. K1VR: NO. The Rohn 45 spec includes some feedline; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00069.html (8,941 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Change in plans. More questions (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:40:18 -0700; Hi Rick, Your observation about Rohn 45G handling less than 25G as read in you Rohn book is not a misprint. If you look close, you will see a couple of other things. One is that 45G includes some mor; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00100.html (11,824 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]