Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Can\s+you\s+TRAM\s+this\s+\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Morrison <junkcmp@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:02:59 -0400
Will this work using a TRAM system and not a crane ? Antenna to raise: 310 lbs x 48ft boom to be installed at 123' Tower: 132' 55G (130MPH guying) with starguy at 122' Tram wire: 1/4" EHS Pulley on t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00371.html (7,390 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:24:58 -0600
Are you back guying the tram line?  I don't know if it is required but for something that big maybe. Antenna to raise: 310 lbs x 48ft boom to be installed at 123' Tower: 132' 55G (130MPH guying) with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00372.html (8,350 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:12:03 -0500
The official N5OT answer: "Try it and see what happens," a statement believed by some to be made by N5OT with no forethought, no engineering, and no data. But actually, I'm only kidding, and that wou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00374.html (9,622 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Morrison <junkcmp@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 12:16:34 -0400
And yes, I will back guy the target tower. Using this rope calculator for two different height anchors, I set one end at H= minus 40ft to simulate the load lifted. and set the other height to 92, whi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00375.html (10,165 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:27:31 -0500
With an antenna that heavy, I think I would rather go with the PITA of loosening the guys and taking one guy off, one level at a time and pulling it up the side of the tower. Or, a crane. Chuck W5PR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00376.html (11,496 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:46:24 -0500
Are there other antennas on this tower? If not, I have installed many large antennas pulling them straight up going around the guys. John KK9A Will this work using a TRAM system and not a crane ? Ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00378.html (8,312 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:52:22 -0700
My 40m went up in a similar way. The pro antenna crew (Paul's crew @ Custom Metal Works) trammed 350# 48 ft boom 3L 40m to 140' on a Rohn 65, back guyed with EHS the 3" alloy mast at 155ft as the tra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00380.html (10,477 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 14:53:22 -0400
I'm not an expert, but I did tram three 4-el SteppIRs, mounted on TIC rings, and a Cal-Av 2D-40A, mounted on the bottom of the mast, up my 110' Rohn 55 tower using a similar system. The SteppIRs are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00381.html (15,000 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Lee <nathaniel.alee65@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:28:37 -0400
The more I read with regards to this topic, the more sense it makes to use a crane. I had a crane dude that was $100 per hour and it made the assembly of my system so easy that the project was finish
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00383.html (17,811 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Can you TRAM this ? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:43:40 -0400
I have trammed many antennas up - the heaviest being 200lbs. A few comments from me: - The tram anchor is much too far away. There will be too much dead load on the tram wire. A more typical angle wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00387.html (8,640 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu