Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cable\s+Loss\s+Comparison\s+\(Was\s+9913\s+reliability\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cable Loss Comparison (Was 9913 reliability) (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 12:26:47 -0600
Thanks for posting your measurements Tony. I converted your percentages to dB total and dB/100 ft as shown in the following table. For your 220 ft runs, it looks like there is little benefit to using
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00459.html (12,317 bytes)

2. Fw:[TowerTalk] Cable Loss Comparison (Was 9913 reliability) (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:19:03 -0600
Hi Tom The data are right in the ballpark for all but the 213 - no real 213 is gonna show better than 1.3db/100ft - so "very interesting indeed!" Press N8UG (I have the MIME problem on my LT and can'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00461.html (10,775 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Cable Loss Comparison (Was 9913 reliability) (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@earthlink.net (N2TK)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:23:19 -0500
Hi Press. You are right. Once Tom converted the numbers to db, the 213 results didn't look right. When I had done the tests I was only interested if everything seemed to be in the ballpark and workin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00464.html (12,027 bytes)

4. Fw:[TowerTalk] Cable Loss Comparison (Was 9913 reliability) (score: 1)
Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 16:05:43 -0500
Press etal, Some time ago I measured various coax lines on a Hewlett Packard 8753 Network analyzer. This instrument is very accurate up through 3 GHz. Here are my measured values of insertion loss at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00466.html (13,057 bytes)

5. Fw:[TowerTalk] Cable Loss Comparison (Was 9913 reliability) (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 16:31:41 -0500
I believe the impedance inconsistency is attributed to the 9913's weak spiral dielectric. The center conductor has a tendency to move from center, particularity when making bends. -Paul, W9AC AN Wir
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00467.html (8,606 bytes)

6. Fw:[TowerTalk] Cable Loss Comparison (Was 9913 reliability) (score: 1)
Author: tao@skypoint.com (Tod - Minnesota)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:33:02 -0600
Joe points out something of significance: (Besides giving us some good, measured data) He said, "...BTW, although I haven't been following this thread very closely, it seems to me that the addition o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00468.html (8,624 bytes)

7. Fw:[TowerTalk] Cable Loss Comparison (Was 9913 reliability) (score: 1)
Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 16:57:00 -0800
I agree heartily with drip loops. I also add a drip string. Just tie a string, preferably the size of binders twine, on the feedlin etc with about 7 inches hand down, make sure that the part around t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00473.html (10,098 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu