Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CUSHCRAFT\s+XM\-240\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CUSHCRAFT\s+XM\-240\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 (score: 1): Author: Bill via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 18:04:24 +0000 (UTC); I've heard good and bad about this antenna. Has anyone used these in a 2/2 stack? Has anyone mounted this antenna above or below a tribander with about 10 feet of spacing above or below? If so, wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00037.html (7,244 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 (score: 1): Author: Tyler Stewart via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 20:24:10 +0000 (UTC); Im using a 402CD++ about 12 feet above a Skyhawk with no trouble. They resonate on 17m instead of 15 due to the loading coils. XM240 is just about the same electrically... 73,Ty K3MM I've heard go; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00042.html (8,434 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 (score: 1): Author: Tyler Stewart via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 20:43:44 +0000 (UTC); Mine is set mid-band. The Swr gets fairly high at the bottom 25kc. Fine for a typical tube amp. Marginal for an Alpha87 or similar. It still performs fine there. Ive never tried stacking a pair.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00043.html (8,281 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 (score: 1): Author: <chetmoore@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:51:47 -0800; Mine is on a 90 foot tower with the C31 on top and xm240 is below the c31 on a gate. As a contester HFTA said the optimum height for the xm240 to Europe ( where the action is,) was 70 feet. No detect; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00044.html (8,967 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:31:16 -0500; If I recall correctly the Moxon is resonant closer to 10m than 15m. The Moxon's elements are a lot larger than the normal shorty-forty beam. If you want a reduced size 40m element, I think loading co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00047.html (8,330 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] CUSHCRAFT XM-240 (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:26:37 -0800; My 40m W6NL Moxon has a 1.5:1 swr dip at 26.8 Mhz. Grant KZ1W On 11/4/2020 14:31, john@kk9a.com wrote: If I recall correctly the Moxon is resonant closer to 10m than 15m. The Moxon's elements are a l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00049.html (9,278 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]