Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Buried\s+section\s+base\.\.\.and\s+lightning\s+protection\.\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Ruz \(CO8DM\)" <co8dm@frcuba.co.cu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:58:01 -0500
Hi, I am almost ready to build a Buried section base for a 25G tower. The hole is 2 x 2 ft and almost 3 ft deep...is it ok for a guyed tower?...it is almost half cubic yard...and about 2000 pounds of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00033.html (7,405 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:59:53 -0800
I am almost ready to build a Buried section base for a 25G tower. How tall? What will be on it? The hole is 2 x 2 ft and almost 3 ft deep...is it ok for a guyed tower?...it is almost half cubic yard.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00038.html (10,783 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:12:11 -0800
I am almost ready to build a Buried section base for a 25G tower. The hole is 2 x 2 ft and almost 3 ft deep...is it ok for a guyed tower?...it is almost half cubic yard...and about 2000 pounds of con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00039.html (8,727 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: R Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:00:27 -0500
How about the center-pin base plate. More better to inspect for rust. I had issues, inside legs of buried section, never seen until it was taken down after 20 years. Sent from my iPhone How tall? Wha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00041.html (10,010 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Ruz \(CO8DM\)" <co8dm@frcuba.co.cu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:20 -0500
I have 5 sections...so, it will be almost 50 ft high tower but one of the sections has problem in one leg at bottom, so, it is not a perfect triangle at bottom...for that reason i will use that secti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00042.html (12,885 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Ruz \(CO8DM\)" <co8dm@frcuba.co.cu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:15:13 -0500
Jim, Thanks for the idea...Are those extra 22 or 23 ft of AWG 4 bare copper connected in some place of the buried section ???.. 73....Douglas, CO8DM "No creo que haya alguna emoción más intensa para
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00043.html (10,864 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:31:55 -0800
This is prevented by a layer of fairly large gravel at the bottom of the hole, so that it's underneath the tower legs. The water is coming down the tower legs from above, and the gravel allows for it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00044.html (9,445 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:25:48 -0800
Thanks for the idea...Are those extra 22 or 23 ft of AWG 4 bare copper connected in some place of the buried section ???.. Just run it generally around the buried section. Concrete is fairly conducti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00045.html (11,275 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:38:24 -0500
Don't forget, to provide proper drainage for the buried tower section set in concrete, such as about 6" of pea gravel or crushed rock.in the bottom of the hole. Mechanically, the base of a guyed towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00046.html (11,099 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Ruz \(CO8DM\)" <co8dm@frcuba.co.cu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:48:09 -0500
Jim, This is great...my qth is very small, so, i need optimize my ground system at the base. The base is about 12 ft from my shack and i have the radios connected to a single ground rod. This single
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00047.html (13,046 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Ruz \(CO8DM\)" <co8dm@frcuba.co.cu>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:50:31 -0500
Thanks Jim and everyone with ideas. The buried section is painted...i think i must remove paint for better contact with concrete for good conductivity. 73....Douglas, CO8DM "No creo que haya alguna e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00057.html (10,254 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:42:18 -0500
I am totally amazed at how concrete has weakened over the years. When I put up my 64' UNGUYED Heights tower in 1970, 4'x4'x4' was all that was required and that held a tribander and other antennas fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00063.html (9,372 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:07:05 -0500
1/6 of a yard of concrete for a freestanding tower? John KK9A I am totally amazed at how concrete has weakened over the years. For a 50' guyed tower, all I used was 30" square and 8" deep. Ken WA8JXM
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00066.html (9,302 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:49:55 -0800
1/6 of a yard of concrete for a freestanding tower? John KK9A I am totally amazed at how concrete has weakened over the years. For a 50' guyed tower, all I used was 30" square and 8" deep. Ken WA8JXM
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00069.html (10,172 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:09:41 -0800
More that people care more about edge cases and unlikely scenarios. All the changes in regulatory codes are usually in response to some "bad event" and a desire to "make sure that can't happen again"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00071.html (11,822 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Buried section base...and lightning protection. (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:21:02 -0500
The base for my LM470, is the first base where I've used rebar. The guyed 100' 45 G has a minimal (~1.5 sq yds) high strength base in hard clay. 3' in dia and a bit over 5'6" deep. I've had 50 and 60
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00101.html (13,857 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu