Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Buried\s+coax\s+in\s+the\s+real\s+world\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Buried\s+coax\s+in\s+the\s+real\s+world\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Buried coax in the real world (score: 1): Author: ChrisB@prism.co.za (Chris Burger); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 16:56:30 +0200; I've had buried coax runs at two locations. Both used unperforated PVC pipe, 100 mm (approx. 4") in diameter. First location: Sloping ground, around 25 m (80') to the tower, good drainage. Five RG213; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00051.html (9,203 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Buried coax in the real world (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 12:27:52 -0400; This is almost the same thing I now do with all my receiving antennas. I recorded the return loss on all the systems. I simply scan through the antennas (all 30 or so) and check them on one frequenc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00054.html (8,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]