Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Broadband\s+75\/80m\s+Inverted\s+Vee\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Broadband\s+75\/80m\s+Inverted\s+Vee\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Broadband 75/80m Inverted Vee (score: 1): Author: Fred Kleber <kleberf@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:53:19 -0700 (PDT); The March/April 2010 of NCJ (Nat'l Contest Journal) has a simple approach to a broadband 75/80m inverted vee. The article was written by N3HBX. It uses a pair of inverted vees (58 foot legs) fed at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00290.html (7,299 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Broadband 75/80m Inverted Vee (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:54:46 -0500; I do not recall this article, I thought that he used phased dipoles after his beam kept breaking. So is this similar to a fan dipole except the legs are equal length and the bandwidth comes from the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00298.html (7,358 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Broadband 75/80m Inverted Vee (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:44:58 -0400; Thought I'd add: I use a center fed, fan dipole with 4' spreaders at the ends and equal length wires. It gives a useable bandwidth of about 100 KHz IIRC. I've been planning on adding a third wire usi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00299.html (9,188 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]