Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Better\s+PC\s+Timekeeper\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Better\s+PC\s+Timekeeper\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: lmcdavid@lmceng.com (Larry McDavid); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 07:55:39 -0700; There is another software program which, I believe, offer significantly enhanced features and configuration options over those mentioned here previously. It is not free, but is available as a free tr; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00739.html (9,018 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: wf3h@enter.net (bob puharic); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 15:57:55 +0000; there is another program which does everything that this one does and is FREE. its called 'about time' and its at http://www.arachnoid.com. this program is 'careware'....the creator says he wants NO; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00742.html (8,477 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 16:27:03 +0100; Those of you who have played with the various shareware programs for setting your PC clocks, how about dialing up wwv and watching the accuracy, then give us a report. I've played with several and ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00744.html (9,939 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 07:09:06 -1000; Aloha, This comparison is very easy to do; just go to: http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/javaclck.htm And the display, after a moment or so, will compare your computer clock to the NIST Java web c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00746.html (9,514 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: wf3h@enter.net (bob puharic); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 17:33:24 +0000; the 'about time' program at http://www.arachnoid.com corrects for the 'ping' delay in getting the time from NIST or USNO. as i look at it vs qsx WWV i can see no measurable difference. in addition, a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00747.html (8,671 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: wf3h@enter.net (bob puharic); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 17:51:30 +0000; yeah i KNOW this ain't world shaking...but since we are discussing time, i thought i'd play around.. i went to this page (thanks for pointing it out; USNO apparently doesnt allow the public to do thi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00748.html (9,068 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 08:33:50 -1000; Have no idea what is going on in your computer, Bob. Are you using the latest versions of either MSIE or Netscape? They have the correct Java code. I ma looking at the site right now on the other com; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00749.html (9,369 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 18:34:58 +0100; -- <towertalk@contesting.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Same result I have. BUT - is it the NIST clock in error, or is it as I suspect, the PC? The second time on the display has to have a propa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00750.html (9,061 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 19:09:09 -0700; Someone had better educate me. Why in the world would you want a program which sets the PC clock within umpty ump nanoseconds? What's wrong with just setting the blooming thing with WWV or H. This th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00752.html (8,232 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: wf3h@enter.net (bob puharic); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 23:08:56 +0000; yeah im using netscape 4.0. i saw somewhere that USNO now does not allow the public to access the clock comparison like they used to. not sure whats going on; like i said, my clock and WWV agree but; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00761.html (9,188 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: wf3h@enter.net (bob puharic); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 23:10:27 +0000; because we're FANATICS...or anal retentive or whatever you wanna call it... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00763.html (8,246 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: wf3h@enter.net (bob puharic); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 23:11:09 +0000; by the by, why have i, all of a sudden, started receiving 2 copies of all the tower talk posts? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00764.html (8,228 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Better PC Timekeeper (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 20:16:21 -0700; Yeah, lets get back to "how far can I stack my KLM 34 from my 402 CD" (again) Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative reque; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00792.html (8,409 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]