Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bazooka\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bazooka\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 07:00:33 -0500; Thanks to all for your comments on the bazooka. The bazooka is now forgotten. Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00034.html (6,557 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:38:35 -0500; To you wire antenna gurus-a question. I read an article about the double bazooka 80m antenna and how two of them in a phased array will provide 4.5db gain in the inverted vee configuration. Won't a s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00859.html (7,139 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 07:50:26 -0400 (EDT); Bill, Essentially, you are correct. In most horizontal phased array systems I have looked at, the 4.5 dB improvement is a bit optimistic. Some a bit over 4 dB is more like it, and you can get similar; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00879.html (8,169 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (score: 1): Author: "k4sb@worldnet.att.net"@worldnet.att.net (Edward W. Sleight); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:10:51 -0700; A way I have used to use closer spacings, yet keep the impedence up is to build the elements as folded dipoles ( which will step up the impedence by 4, or folded tripoles ( which gives you an increas; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00894.html (7,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]