Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ballon\-held\s+Vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ballon\-held\s+Vertical\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Ballon-held Vertical (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek); Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 13:03:43 -0500; One more question: Does anyone have any information on 5/8-wavelength verticals for 160 meters? [about 324 ft. high] Using 2-meter comparisons ... seems this would be a lot better for DX. I'm thinkin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00185.html (7,858 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Ballon-held Vertical (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com (K4IA@aol.com); Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:21:44 EST; Be very very careful. If that thing gets away, you are dragging 300 feet of wire across the landscape -- including power lines. Even if it goes straight up at first, it will come down eventually and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00190.html (8,478 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Ballon-held Vertical (score: 1): Author: Bob.Finger@DynCorp.com (Finger, Bob); Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:02:29 -0500; Do not forget about FAA regulations. If it is going to be that high, you will need to light the thing, or at the very least notify the FAA every time you put it up so they can issue a NOTAM. Pilots r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00194.html (9,782 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Ballon-held Vertical (score: 1): Author: kk6t@joneslumber.com (Terry Dunlap); Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 11:15:55 -0800; I have been considering one also for 160M but it occurred to me that it would be up at night and police and other helicopters fly over my house pretty low. Anyone know the FAA restrictions on this ty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00196.html (7,756 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Ballon-held Vertical (score: 1): Author: basalop@gte.net (Jim Berry); Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:23:44 -0800; If I was going to do that, I would go to a car lot, or appliance store, that uses those things for advertisement. There must be thousands used around here. Find out the name of the outfit they bought; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00197.html (7,712 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Ballon-held Vertical (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com (K4IA@aol.com); Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:34:09 EST; I like your idea of the light duty link between the antenna and the balloon. That is better than a slip knot. But it is not redundant. In other words, if your wire and static line both came undone at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00198.html (8,719 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Ballon-held Vertical (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 21:15:34 -0500; I have a 318 foot insulated tower for 160 meters that I can use as a vertical. It is clearly not as good as my 200 foot tall vertical, except for long distances during the daytime when it might be a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00206.html (8,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]